Editorials |
From the Program in Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago.
Correspondence to Pieter P. de Tombe, PhD, Department of Physiology & Biophysics, 835 South Wolcott Ave MC 901, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612. E-mail pdetombe@uic.edu
See related article, pages 12901298
Key Words: myosin accessory proteins sarcomere cross-bridge cycling regulation
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
Myocardial force generation is initiated on the release of calcium ions from the sarcoplasmic reticulum and subsequent activation of the contractile apparatus.1 A schematic of the cardiac sarcomere and some of its component proteins is shown in the Figure.2 Contractile activation involves binding calcium to Tn-C, redistribution of the affinity of Tn-I for Tn-C away from Tn-T, and movement of tropomyosin on the thin filament, thereby exposing binding sites on actin. Binding of the myosin S1 domain to actin leads to cross-bridge force development. However, this simple two state model of muscle contraction is not sufficient to explain many features of muscle contraction.2 For example, the rate of force development critically depends on the activation state of the thin filament.2 Also, binding of a modified myosin (NEM-S1 which cannot hydrolyze ATP) has been shown to abolish this phenomenon.3 This, and other structural evidence, has led to the hypothesis that the thin filament must have at least three states: a blocked state (top left), where tropomyosin sterically blocks S1 binding; a closed state, induced by calcium binding to Tn-C, where tropomyosin has shifted away somewhat allowing weak interaction with the S1 domain; and an open state, where tropomyosin has moved away fully allowing for a strong interaction with S1 and force generation (bottom).2 One interesting aspect of this theory is that the binding of myosin to actin by itself induces further activation of the thin filament, thus facilitating S1 domain binding along the filament; an elegant, yet simple molecular model of
Related Article:
Circ. Res. 2006 98: 1290-1298.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Ge, I. N. Rybakova, Q. Xu, and R. L. Moss Top-down high-resolution mass spectrometry of cardiac myosin binding protein C revealed that truncation alters protein phosphorylation state PNAS, August 4, 2009; 106(31): 12658 - 12663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Colson, T. Bekyarova, M. R. Locher, D. P. Fitzsimons, T. C. Irving, and R. L. Moss Protein Kinase A-Mediated Phosphorylation of cMyBP-C Increases Proximity of Myosin Heads to Actin in Resting Myocardium Circ. Res., August 1, 2008; 103(3): 244 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. L. Granzier and K. B. Campbell New Insights in the Role of Cardiac Myosin Binding Protein C As a Regulator of Cardiac Contractility Circ. Res., October 13, 2006; 99(8): 795 - 797. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Stelzer, J. R. Patel, and R. L. Moss Protein Kinase A-Mediated Acceleration of the Stretch Activation Response in Murine Skinned Myocardium Is Eliminated by Ablation of cMyBP-C Circ. Res., October 13, 2006; 99(8): 884 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |