Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2008;103:119-121
doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.180828
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Efimov, I. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Efimov, I. R.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
(Circulation Research. 2008;103:119.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorials

Nature Versus Nurture in Cardiac Conduction

Toward Integrative Paradigm of Cardiac Tissue Engineering

Igor R. Efimov

From the Washington University in Saint Louis, Mo.

Correspondence to Professor Igor R. Efimov, Washington University, Biomedical Engineering, Campus Box 1097, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899. E-mail igor@wustl.edu



See related article, pages 167–176


Key Words: conduction • connexin43 • stem cell plasticity • stem cells • tissue culture • tissue engineering


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

"Biology today is at a crossroads. The molecular paradigm, which so successfully guided the discipline throughout most of the 20th century, is no longer a reliable guide. Its vision of biology now realized, the molecular paradigm has run its course. Biology, therefore, has a choice to make, between the comfortable path of continuing to follow molecular biology’s lead or the more invigorating one of seeking a new and inspiring vision of the living world, one that addresses the major problems in biology that 20th century biology, molecular biology, could not handle and, so, avoided."1

— —Carl R. Woese

Circulation research, as many other branches of biomedical science, has motivated many young investigators by the promise of delivering to society therapies against deadly diseases. As with all branches of the natural sciences, circulation research follows periodic changes in overarching methodological approaches that dominate the field for several decades. The two extremes of this research pendulum are the reductionist and the integrative approaches to the cardiovascular system. Five years ago, Eugene Braunwald reflected on the 50th anniversary of the journal Circulation Research, whose inaugural Editor in Chief was Carl J. Wiggers.2 Braunwald recalled a dominance of the reductionist approach that was personified by the leading physiologist of the beginning of the 20th century, Ernest H. Starling, followed by the integrative approach under the leadership of Carl J. Wiggers. "As cardiovascular research has unfolded in the 50 years of Circulation Research, the pendulum between the reductionist and holistic approaches has swung . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article:

Forced Alignment of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Undergoing Cardiomyogenic Differentiation Affects Functional Integration With Cardiomyocyte Cultures
Daniël A. Pijnappels, Martin J. Schalij, Arti A. Ramkisoensing, John van Tuyn, Antoine A.F. de Vries, Arnoud van der Laarse, Dirk L. Ypey, and Douwe E. Atsma
Circ. Res. 2008 103: 167-176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]