Editorials |
From the Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Correspondence to Timothy J. Kamp, H6/343 Clinical Science Center, Box 3248, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792. E-mail tjk@medicine. wisc.edu
Key Words: gene therapy calcium channel blocker Gem RGK protein L-type Ca2+ channel
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
Ca2+ channel blockers have been an important part of the cardiovascular pharmacological armamentarium for more than 2 decades. These agents were developed as antianginals and antihypertensives, but their indications have expanded to include treatment of certain arrhythmias because of their atrioventricular (AV) nodal blocking properties. Interestingly, the development of these compounds largely preceded our knowledge of the molecular composition and detailed functional properties of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. In fact, Ca2+ channel blockers were critical in defining the distinct class of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels referred to as L-type Ca2+ channels, which can be found in cardiac myocytes, skeletal myocytes, vascular smooth muscle cells, neurons, and endocrine cells among other cells. Despite this broad distribution of L-type Ca2+ channels, Ca2+ channel blockers have proven useful agents because they exhibit pharmacological specificity for vascular smooth muscle and cardiac muscle. This specificity is attributable to a variety of factors including the voltage and use-dependent blocking properties of these agents, subtle differences in the sensitivity of distinct isoforms of L-type Ca2+ channels present in different tissues, and the tissue distribution of the drugs. In addition, different classes of Ca2+ channel blockers vary in their relative potency to block vascular smooth muscle Ca2+ channels (antihypertensive/antianginal properties) relative to their block of AV nodal Ca2+ channels (antiarrhythmic properties). Alas, the specificity is not perfect, and so these agents can bring with them undesired side effects including constipation, peripheral edema, dizziness, and headache. In addition, problems can arise from the overlap of vascular smooth muscle and cardiac blocking
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. S. Finlin, R. N. Correll, C. Pang, S. M. Crump, J. Satin, and D. A. Andres Analysis of the Complex between Ca2+ Channel beta-Subunit and the Rem GTPase J. Biol. Chem., August 18, 2006; 281(33): 23557 - 23566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. S. Finlin, A. L. Mosley, S. M. Crump, R. N. Correll, S. Ozcan, J. Satin, and D. A. Andres Regulation of L-type Ca2+ Channel Activity and Insulin Secretion by the Rem2 GTPase J. Biol. Chem., December 23, 2005; 280(51): 41864 - 41871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |