Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2003;93:e74
doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000095452.77140.7A
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mungrue, I. N.
Right arrow Articles by Husain, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mungrue, I. N.
Right arrow Articles by Husain, M.
(Circulation Research. 2003;93:e74.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letter to the Editor

The Janus Faces of iNOS

Imran N. Mungrue, Duncan J. Stewart, Mansoor Husain

The Toronto General and St Michael’s Hospitals, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, mansoor.husain@utoronto.ca


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

To the Editor:

Recently, two groups have reported on the phenotype of transgenic mice with cardiac-specific overexpression of the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). Although both used the {alpha}-MHC promoter to target iNOS expression, our model used the tetracycline-regulated system ({alpha}MtTA+/iNOS+),1 whereas the other used a nonconditional approach.2 Intriguingly, the phenotypes reported varied dramatically, from lethal arrhythmias in our case, to no identifiable abnormality in the second. Additionally, a recent publication from the second group3 includes criticisms of our work that are misleading.

The statement that "iNOS activity in [the nonconditional] model is approximately 100- to 120-fold higher than...in the conditional model" (page 1357)3 is unfounded. A direct comparison between cardiac iNOS activities in the two models is not possible. Heger et al2 presented S-ethylisothiourea-sensitive conversion of arginine to citrulline (control: 1.7±3.1 versus transgenic: 697±238 pmolxmin-1xmg-1), whereas we measured L-NMMA–sensitive Ca2+-independent activity (1 mmol/L EGTA) (0.056±0.05 versus 4.57±1.36 pmolxmin-1xmg-1).1 While both provide measures of iNOS activity, absolute values varied considerably. Although baseline values in the Heger mice were ostensibly {approx}30-fold higher than ours, it is apparent from these1,2 (and other4) reports that basal cardiac iNOS activity in mice is not different from zero. Thus, it is inappropriate to compare directly the reported iNOS activities in these models. Normalizing iNOS activity using control values is invalid, since fold increases based on a denominator that approaches zero is prone to overestimation.

In our view, a more . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
P. Pacher, J. S. Beckman, and L. Liaudet
Nitric Oxide and Peroxynitrite in Health and Disease
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2007; 87(1): 315 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]