This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Loscalzo, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Loscalzo, J.

(Circulation Research. 2003;93:583.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.

Editorials

The Evolution of the Discipline of Vascular Biology

From Systems Physiology to Molecular Biology to Molecular Systems

Joseph Loscalzo

From the Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute and Evans Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass.

Correspondence to Joseph Loscalzo, Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute and Evans Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, 88 E Newton St, Boston, MA. E-mail jloscalz@bu.edu

Key Words: vascular biology • human genome project • nitric oxide

An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.

The changes in vascular research over the past half century have been nothing short of extraordinary. From the evolution in technologies to the analytical process, advances that were not even imaginable 50 years ago have led to far-reaching insights into the biology of the blood vessel and the diseases that affect it.

This period has also witnessed two major shifts in the general experimental paradigm of vascular biology. At mid-century, vascular biologists used physiological methods to attempt to understand phenotype. Their primary focus was on vascular tone and its neurohumoral determinants in health and disease. Limited by available methods, they were essentially unable to apply biochemical or molecular analysis to the characterization of vascular function. That situation, however, changed approximately 25 years later by which time modern techniques of cell culture were applied to vascular cells, and microanalytical methods, as well as novel reagents, became available for more precise molecular characterization of vascular phenotype. Of note, both of these historical phases of research in vascular biology used the conventional analytical regimen of reductionism: an investigator typically identified a vascular reflex or endothelial product of primary interest, asked a scientific question about the role of this reflex or molecule on vascular phenotype, designed experiments and controls that focused on that question, then drew inferences from the observed experimental result—without regard for other factors in the vessel that might influence the observed phenomenon.

In the past decade, another major shift in the investigative paradigm has been developing as a result of access . . . [Full Text of this Article]