Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2002;91:e2
doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000029423.88400.52
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xi, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xi, L.
(Circulation Research. 2002;91:e2.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Exercise Does Not Protect the Female Heart: An Unconvincing Conclusion?

Lei Xi

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va, lxi@vcu.edu


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

To the Editor:

The recent article by Paroo et al1 addressed an important issue relating to the sex difference in exercise-induced late cardioprotection against ischemia-reperfusion (I-R) injury. This study prompts a few concerns that I would like to share with the Editors and the readers of Circulation Research.

(1) Exercise-induced cardioprotection in females. In this study, Paroo et al1 reported a rather provocative finding showing no exercise-induced cardioprotection in female rats compared with males, which challenges the common sense that moderate exercise could benefit both males and females in reducing cardiovascular risk factors and improving postinfarct heart function and survival. Unfortunately, these authors ignored the fact that a number of studies by several research groups have independently demonstrated the exercise-induced cardioprotection against I-R injury in female rats2–4 or dogs.5 In particular, there is an obvious discrepancy between their experimental data and those of Ji et al, 2 Taylor et al,3 and Hamilton et al,4 who were able to find enhanced postischemic ventricular contractile function in female rats after exercise training.

(2) Hsp70 as the primary determinant in delayed cardioprotection. Contrary to what Paroo et al1 concluded on the critical role of Hsp70, the above-mentioned studies in female rats3,4 suggested that exercise-induced cardioprotection is not dependent on Hsp70, given that exercise under either cold or warm environment resulted in similar cardiac resistance to I-R despite the blunted Hsp70 induction in the cold group compared with the warm group. In addition, recent studies from our group6–8 and many others9–11 showed that Hsp70 is . . . [Full Text of this Article]