Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2000;87:427-428

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Welsh, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Welsh, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, M. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology
Right arrow Cell signalling/signal transduction
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide
Right arrow Other Vascular biology
(Circulation Research. 2000;87:427.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorials

A Case for Myoendothelial Gap Junctions

Donald G. Welsh, Mark T. Nelson

From the Department of Pharmacology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vt.

Correspondence to Dr Mark Nelson, Room B-303, Given Building, Department of Pharmacology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05404. E-mail nelson@salus.med.uvm.edu


Key Words: endothelium • smooth muscle • gap junctions


*    Introduction
 
Tissue perfusion is controlled by a network of resistance arteries linked in series and parallel with one another. It has been long appreciated that blood flow resistance is distributed throughout this network, and thus substantive change in perfusion only occurs when coupled arteries respond in a coordinated fashion. To coordinate vasomotor responses, vascular cells must communicate with one another. This communication is, in part, facilitated by gap junctions, which are intercellular pores that permit charged ions, second messenger molecules, and small metabolites to pass among adjacent cells. Gap junctions are formed by two hemichannels, each containing 6 connexin proteins. At present, the connexin gene family is comprised of 14 members, with the most predominant subtypes being Cx40 and Cx43 in vascular smooth muscle1 and Cx37, Cx40, and Cx43 in endothelial cells.2

For gap junctions to form an electrical or diffusional conduit, vascular cells must lie in close apposition to each other. With few structural elements limiting the contact of adjacent smooth muscle cells or adjacent endothelial cells, it has been widely accepted that these cells are homologously coupled. Indeed, studies using connexin antibodies to characterize gap junctional distribution have substantiated this view.1 3 4 In contrast, the internal elastic lamina, a connective tissue layer that separates smooth muscle from the endothelium, has been presumed to prevent the formation of heterologous (ie, myoendothelial) gap junctions. However, some studies have shown that the internal elastic lamina is not contiguous and that endothelial cells can indeed penetrate this barrier, emerging in close apposition to the . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
S. Boitano, Z. Safdar, D. G. Welsh, J. Bhattacharya, and M. Koval
Cell-cell interactions in regulating lung function
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, September 1, 2004; 287(3): L455 - L459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]