Published online before print September 24, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.200519
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on May 6, 2009
Revised on September 8, 2009
Accepted on September 10, 2009
Differential Healing After Sirolimus, Paclitaxel, and Bare Metal Stent Placement in Combination With Peroxisome Proliferator-Activator Receptor 
Agonists. Requirement for mTOR/Akt2 in PPAR Activation
Aloke V. Finn *;
From the Emory University School of Medicine (A.V.F., M.J., R.P., V.K., C.R., T.E., S.L.), Atlanta, Ga; CVPath Institute Inc (G.N., X.X., Q.C., F.D.K., R.V.), Gaithersburg, Md; Massachusetts General Hospital (H.K.G.), Boston, Mass; and Boston Scientific (M.E.), Natick, Mass.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: avfinn{at}emory.edu.
Rationale: Sirolimus-eluting coronary stents (SESs) and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents (PESs) are used to reduce restenosis but have different sites of action. The molecular targets of sirolimus overlap with those of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)
agonist rosiglitazone (RSG) but the consequence of this interaction on endothelialization is unknown.
Objective: Using the New Zealand white rabbit iliac model of stenting, we examined the effects of RSG on SESs, PESs, and bare metal stents endothelialization.
Methods and Results: Animals receiving SESs, PESs, or bare metal stents and either RSG (3 mg/kg per day) or placebo were euthanized at 28 days, and arteries were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Fourteen-day organ culture and Western blotting of iliac arteries and tissue culture experiments were conducted. Endothelialization was significantly reduced by RSG in SESs but not in PESs or bare metal stents. Organ culture revealed reduced vascular endothelial growth factor in SESs receiving RSG compared to RSG animals receiving bare metal stent or PESs. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction in human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs) revealed that sirolimus (but not paclitaxel) inhibited RSG-induced vascular endothelial growth factor transcription. Western blotting demonstrated that inhibition of molecular signaling in SES+RSG–treated arteries was similar to findings in HAECs treated with RSG and small interfering RNA to PPAR, suggesting that sirolimus inhibits PPAR. Transfection of HAECs with mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) short hairpin RNA and with Akt2 small interfering RNA significantly inhibited RSG-mediated transcriptional upregulation of heme oxygenase-1, a PPAR target gene. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay demonstrated sirolimus interferes with binding of PPAR to its response elements in heme oxygenase-1 promoter.
Conclusions: mTOR/Akt2 is required for optimal PPAR activation. Patients who receive SESs during concomitant RSG treatment may be at risk for delayed stent healing.
Key words: stents • thrombosis • endothelium • pharmacology