This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 97/2/168    most recent 01.RES.0000174429.00987.17v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rodríguez, B. Articles by Trayanova, N. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rodríguez, B. Articles by Trayanova, N. A. Related Collections Arrythmias-basic studies

(Circulation Research. 2005;97:168.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.

Integrative Physiology

Differences Between Left and Right Ventricular Chamber Geometry Affect Cardiac Vulnerability to Electric Shocks

Blanca Rodríguez, Li Li, James C. Eason, Igor R. Efimov, Natalia A. Trayanova

From the Tulane University (B.R., N.A.T), New Orleans, La; Washington University (L.L., I.R.E.), St. Louis, Mo; and Washington and Lee University (J.C.E.), Lexington, Va. The current affiliation for B.R. is Oxford University Computing Laboratory, Oxford, UK.

Correspondence to Natalia Trayanova, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lindy Boggs Center, Suite 500, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118. E-mail nataliat{at}tulane.edu

Although effects of shock strength and waveform on cardiac vulnerability to electric shocks have been extensively documented, the contribution of ventricular anatomy to shock-induced polarization and postshock propagation and thus, to shock outcome, has never been quantified; this is caused by lack of experimental methodology capable of mapping 3-D electrical activity. The goal of this study was to use optical imaging experiments and 3-D bidomain simulations to investigate the role of structural differences between left and right ventricles in vulnerability to electric shocks in rabbit hearts. The ventricles were paced apically, and uniform-field, truncated-exponential, monophasic shocks of reversed polarity were applied over a range of coupling intervals (CIs) in experiment and model. Experiments and simulations revealed that reversing the direction of externally-applied field (RV– or LV– shocks) alters the shape of the vulnerability area (VA), the 2-D grid encompassing episodes of arrhythmia induction. For RV– shocks, VA was nearly rectangular indicating little dependence of postshock arrhythmogenesis on CI. For LV– shocks, the probability of arrhythmia induction was higher for longer than for shorter CIs. The 3-D simulations demonstrated that these effects stem from the fact that reversal of field direction results in relocation of the main postshock excitable area from LV wall (RV– shocks) to septum (LV– shocks). Furthermore, the effect of septal (but not LV) excitable area in postshock propagation was found to strongly depend on preshock state. Knowledge regarding the location of the main postshock excitable area within the 3-D ventricular volume could be important for improving defibrillation efficacy.

Key Words: ventricles • virtual electrode polarization • reentry • excitable area • arrhythmia induction

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Ashihara, J. Constantino, and N. A. Trayanova Tunnel Propagation of Postshock Activations as a Hypothesis for Fibrillation Induction and Isoelectric Window Circ. Res., March 28, 2008; 102(6): 737 - 745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Plank, A. Prassl, E. Hofer, and N. A. Trayanova Evaluating Intramural Virtual Electrodes in the Myocardial Wedge Preparation: Simulations of Experimental Conditions Biophys. J., March 1, 2008; 94(5): 1904 - 1915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Bishop, B. Rodriguez, F. Qu, I. R. Efimov, D. J. Gavaghan, and N. A. Trayanova The Role of Photon Scattering in Optical Signal Distortion during Arrhythmia and Defibrillation Biophys. J., November 15, 2007; 93(10): 3714 - 3726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-J. Yang, D. X. Tran, J. N. Weiss, A. Garfinkel, and Z. Qu The pinwheel experiment revisited: effects of cellular electrophysiological properties on vulnerability to cardiac reentry Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): H1781 - H1790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Qu, A. Garfinkel, and J. N. Weiss Vulnerable Window for Conduction Block in a One-Dimensional Cable of Cardiac Cells, 1: Single Extrasystoles Biophys. J., August 1, 2006; 91(3): 793 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Pollard and R. C. Barr Cardiac microimpedance measurement in two-dimensional models using multisite interstitial stimulation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2006; 290(5): H1976 - H1987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Trew, B. J. Caldwell, G. B. Sands, D. A. Hooks, D. C.-S. Tai, T. M. Austin, I. J. LeGrice, A. J. Pullan, and B. H. Smaill Cardiac electrophysiology and tissue structure: bridging the scale gap with a joint measurement and modelling paradigm Exp Physiol, March 1, 2006; 91(2): 355 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Trayanova Defibrillation of the heart: insights into mechanisms from modelling studies Exp Physiol, March 1, 2006; 91(2): 323 - 337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]