Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 1995;77:593-602

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhou, X.
Right arrow Articles by Knisley, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhou, X.
Right arrow Articles by Knisley, S. B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*DIACETYL
(Circulation Research. 1995;77:593-602.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Optical Transmembrane Potential Measurements During Defibrillation-Strength Shocks in Perfused Rabbit Hearts

Xiaohong Zhou, Raymond E. Ideker, Timothy F. Blitchington, William M. Smith, Stephen B. Knisley

From the Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, and the Engineering Research Center in Emerging Cardiovascular Technologies, School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC.

Correspondence to Xiaohong Zhou, MD, G82A Volker Hall, Box 201, UAB Station, Birmingham, AL 35294-0019. E-mail xhz@dukebar.crml.uab.edu.

Abstract To study the optical transmembrane potential change ({Delta}F) induced during shocks, optical recordings were obtained in 15 isolated perfused rabbit hearts treated with the potentiometric dye di-4-ANEPPS and diacetyl monoxime. Shock electrodes were sutured on the right and left ventricles. A laser beam 30 µm in diameter was used to optically excite di-4-ANEPPS. Fluorescence from a region 150 µm in diameter was recorded during a shock. In the macroscopic study (six animals), there were nine recording spots that were 3 mm apart between the two shock electrodes. In the microscopic study, there were three recording regions that were 3 mm away from either shock electrode and midway between them, with nine recording spots that were 30 µm (three animals), 100 µm (three animals), and 300 µm (three animals) apart in each region. After 20 S1 stimuli, a 10-ms truncated exponential S2 shock of defibrillation-threshold strength was given during the plateau of the last S1 action potential. In the microscopic study, shocks were also given during diastole, with {Delta}F recordings at the three recording regions. Shocks of both polarities were tested. {Delta}F during the shock was expressed as a percentage of the fluorescence change during the S1 upstroke action potential amplitude (the S1 Fapa), ie, {Delta}F/Fapa%. In the macroscopic study, the magnitudes of {Delta}F/Fapa% from recording spots 1 to 9, numbered from the left to the right ventricular electrodes, were 77±41%, 46±32%, 32±27%, 28±20%, 37±25%, 24±20%, 33±22%, 37±25%, and 59±29%, respectively (P<.05 among the nine spots). Depolarization or hyperpolarization could occur near either shock electrode with both shock polarities, but the magnitude of hyperpolarization was 1.8±0.9 times that of depolarization at the same recording spot when the shock polarity was reversed (P<.01). In the microscopic study, the change in {Delta}F/Fapa% varied significantly over the microscopic regions examined. The maximum values of {Delta}F/Fapa% for hyperpolarizing shocks during diastole reached only 7±10% of those for shocks during the plateau (P<.01). During diastole, the time until a new action potential occurred after the beginning of the shock was shorter when the membrane was depolarized (1.1±0.5 ms) than when it was hyperpolarized (12.8±9.1 ms, P<.01). Conclusions are as follows: (1) A shock can induce either hyperpolarization or depolarization. (2) Hyperpolarization or depolarization during a shock can occur near either the anodal or cathodal shock electrode. (3) Variation of {Delta}F/Fapa% exists within a microscopic region. (4) The effects of a shock during an action potential plateau are different from those during diastole. (5) The different responses of the {Delta}F during a shock affect the excitation latency during diastole.


Key Words: action potential duration • di-4-ANEPPS • electrical defibrillation • optical transmembrane potential




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. M. Maleckar, M. C. Woods, V. Y. Sidorov, M. R. Holcomb, D. N. Mashburn, J. P. Wikswo, and N. A. Trayanova
Polarity reversal lowers activation time during diastolic field stimulation of the rabbit ventricles: insights into mechanisms
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2008; 295(4): H1626 - H1633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
G. Plank, A. Prassl, E. Hofer, and N. A. Trayanova
Evaluating Intramural Virtual Electrodes in the Myocardial Wedge Preparation: Simulations of Experimental Conditions
Biophys. J., March 1, 2008; 94(5): 1904 - 1915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
C. W. Zemlin, S. Mironov, and A. M. Pertsov
Near-threshold field stimulation: Intramural versus surface activation
Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2006; 69(1): 98 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
V. P. Nikolski and I. R. Efimov
Electroporation of the heart
Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(s2): S146 - S154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
T. Ashihara and N. A. Trayanova
Cell and tissue responses to electric shocks
Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(s2): S155 - S165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
N. H. L. Kuijpers, R. H. Keldermann, T. Arts, and P. A. J. Hilbers
Computer simulations of successful defibrillation in decoupled and non-uniform cardiac tissue
Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(s2): S166 - S177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
T. Ashihara and N. A. Trayanova
Asymmetry in Membrane Responses to Electric Shocks: Insights from Bidomain Simulations
Biophys. J., October 1, 2004; 87(4): 2271 - 2282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
V. P. Nikolski, A. T. Sambelashvili, V. I. Krinsky, and I. R. Efimov
Effects of electroporation on optically recorded transmembrane potential responses to high-intensity electrical shocks
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2004; 286(1): H412 - H418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
V. G. Fast, O. F. Sharifov, E. R. Cheek, J. C. Newton, and R. E. Ideker
Intramural Virtual Electrodes During Defibrillation Shocks in Left Ventricular Wall Assessed by Optical Mapping of Membrane Potential
Circulation, August 20, 2002; 106(8): 1007 - 1014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
V. G. Fast and E. R. Cheek
Optical Mapping of Arrhythmias Induced by Strong Electrical Shocks in Myocyte Cultures
Circ. Res., April 5, 2002; 90(6): 664 - 670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
L. Tung and A. G. Kleber
Virtual sources associated with linear and curved strands of cardiac cells
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2000; 279(4): H1579 - H1590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
I. R. Efimov, F. Aguel, Y. Cheng, B. Wollenzier, and N. Trayanova
Virtual electrode polarization in the far field: implications for external defibrillation
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2000; 279(3): H1055 - H1070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. M. Gillis, V. G. Fast, S. Rohr, and A. G. Kleber
Mechanism of Ventricular Defibrillation : The Role of Tissue Geometry in the Changes in Transmembrane Potential in Patterned Myocyte Cultures
Circulation, May 23, 2000; 101(20): 2438 - 2445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
Y. Cheng, K. A. Mowrey, D. R. Van Wagoner, P. J. Tchou, and I. R. Efimov
Virtual Electrode-Induced Reexcitation : A Mechanism of Defibrillation
Circ. Res., November 26, 1999; 85(11): 1056 - 1066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. K.-L. Cheng, L. Tung, and E. A. Sobie
Nonuniform responses of transmembrane potential during electric field stimulation of single cardiac cells
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 1999; 277(1): H351 - H362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
X. Zhou, S. B. Knisley, W. M. Smith, D. Rollins, A. E. Pollard, and R. E. Ideker
Spatial Changes in the Transmembrane Potential During Extracellular Electric Stimulation
Circ. Res., November 16, 1998; 83(10): 1003 - 1014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
X. Zhou, W. M. Smith, R. K. Justice, J. L. Wayland, and R. E. Ideker
Transmembrane potential changes caused by monophasic and biphasic shocks
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 1998; 275(5): H1798 - H1807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
I. R. Efimov, Y. Cheng, D. R. Van Wagoner, T. Mazgalev, and P. J. Tchou
Virtual Electrode–Induced Phase Singularity : A Basic Mechanism of Defibrillation Failure
Circ. Res., May 4, 1998; 82(8): 918 - 925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
A. M. Gillis, V. G. Fast, S. Rohr, and A. G. Kleber
Spatial Changes in Transmembrane Potential During Extracellular Electrical Shocks in Cultured Monolayers of Neonatal Rat Ventricular Myocytes
Circ. Res., October 1, 1996; 79(4): 676 - 690.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
V. G. Fast and E. R. Cheek
Optical Mapping of Arrhythmias Induced by Strong Electrical Shocks in Myocyte Cultures
Circ. Res., April 5, 2002; 90(6): 664 - 670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]