Effects of calcium channel antagonists on carotid sinus baroreflex control of arterial pressure and heart rate in anesthetized dogs

« Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article »

Circulation Research. 1989;64:276-286

This Article

	Full Text (PDF)
	Alert me when this article is cited
	Alert me if a correction is posted

Services

	Email this article to a friend
	Similar articles in this journal
	Similar articles in PubMed
	Alert me to new issues of the journal
	Download to citation manager
	Request Permissions

Citing Articles

	Citing Articles via Google Scholar

Google Scholar

	Articles by Rigel, D. F.
	Articles by Millard, R. W.
	Search for Related Content

PubMed

	PubMed Citation
	Articles by Rigel, D. F.
	Articles by Millard, R. W.

ARTICLES

Effects of calcium channel antagonists on carotid sinus baroreflex control of arterial pressure and heart rate in anesthetized dogs

DF Rigel and RW Millard
Department of Pharmacology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio 45267-0575.

Our study was designed to determine whether the calcium channel antagonists verapamil, diltiazem, and nifedipine and the nitrate vasodilator sodium nitroprusside modulate carotid sinus (CS) baroreflex control of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR). Pentobarbital-anesthetized, vagotomized dogs were surgically prepared for reversible vascular isolation of the CS regions. Open-loop performance of the CS baroreflex was determined under control conditions and after intravenous infusion of each agent for 20 minutes at four rates (nitroprusside: 0.3-10 micrograms/kg/min; verapamil and diltiazem: 1-30 micrograms/kg/min; nifedipine: 0.1-3 micrograms/kg/min). With the CS baroreflex loop closed, each vasodilator decreased MAP from control (nitroprusside: 127 +/- 3 to 69 +/- 5 mm Hg; verapamil: 137 +/- 7 to 86 +/- 5 mm Hg; diltiazem: 137 +/- 9 to 100 +/- 5 mm Hg; nifedipine: 140 +/- 6 to 109 +/- 7 mm Hg). Each compound also caused a dose-dependent downward shift in the open-loop CSP-MAP relations. The higher doses of each vasodilator also depressed the total range of control of MAP (i.e., maximum MAP minus minimum MAP) by the baroreflex and significantly attenuated the peak open-loop MAP/CSP gains (nitroprusside: 1.21 +/- 0.19 to 0.56 +/- 0.12; verapamil: 1.36 +/- 0.16 to 0.64 +/- 0.10; diltiazem: 1.52 +/- 0.34 to 0.89 +/- 0.11; nifedipine: 1.35 +/- 0.20 to 0.83 +/- 0.14) but did not alter the CSP at which the peak gain was manifest. Only verapamil and diltiazem significantly shifted downward the CSP-HR relations, whereas none of the drugs affected the total range of baroreflex control of HR (i.e., maximum HR minus minimum HR) or the peak open-loop HR/CSP gains. Our results suggest that 1) it is unlikely that calcium channel antagonists act directly on the baroreceptors or the neural components of the baroreflex loop (i.e., afferent, central and efferent nerves) because they impair CS baroreflex control of MAP but not HR and 2) the impairment of MAP control is predominantly due to a nonspecific blunting of adrenergic vasoconstriction.