Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 1989;64:265-275

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunter, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hunter, W. C.

Circulation Research, Vol 64, 265-275, Copyright © 1989 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

End-systolic pressure as a balance between opposing effects of ejection

WC Hunter
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins Medical School, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

Ejection has previously been thought to exert only negative effects on end-systolic left ventricular pressure, via mechanisms like shortening deactivation and the force-velocity relation. Whether ejection also exerted a positive influence on pressure generation was tested by comparing two successive beats: 1) the last beat of steady-state ejection versus 2) a totally isovolumic contraction at the end-systolic volume. In 12 isolated, blood-perfused canine hearts loaded with a simulated arterial system, ejecting end-systolic pressure exceeded isovolumic pressure by approximately 10 mm Hg when ejection fraction was 0.3. With both higher and lower ejection fractions, the excess of ejecting end-systolic pressure was smaller; beyond an ejection fraction of roughly 0.5, the trend reversed so that ejecting end-systolic pressure fell below isovolumic pressure. The maximum excess in ejecting end-systolic pressure was quite variable (1-17 mm Hg), but the pattern of its variation with ejection fraction was consistent. A correlate of the positive effect of ejection on ventricular pressure was found in the timing of end systole. For an ejection fraction of 0.4, the systolic duration of ejecting beats was approximately 45% longer than in isovolumic beats (range, 23-67%). Potentially, a positive effect of ejection might be due to a residual influence of the stronger activation of cardiac myofilaments early in ejecting systole during which the sarcomeres were at longer lengths than in the isovolumic beat at end-systolic volume (length-dependent activation). A hypothetical model based on this mechanism reproduced both of the positive effects of ejection that were observed: excess end-systolic pressure and prolonged duration of systole. Thus, the approximate load independence of end-systolic pressure could result from the counter balance between opposing influences of ejection.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
T. Kind, N. Westerhof, T. J. C. Faes, J.-W. Lankhaar, P. Steendijk, and A. Vonk-Noordegraaf
Cardiac phase-dependent time normalization reduces load dependence of time-varying elastance
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2009; 296(2): H342 - H349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
K. B. Campbell, A. M. Simpson, S. G. Campbell, H. L. Granzier, and B. K. Slinker
Dynamic left ventricular elastance: a model for integrating cardiac muscle contraction into ventricular pressure-volume relationships
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2008; 104(4): 958 - 975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JGPHome page
J. E. Stelzer and R. L. Moss
Contributions of Stretch Activation to Length-dependent Contraction in Murine Myocardium
J. Gen. Physiol., October 1, 2006; 128(4): 461 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JGPHome page
K. B. Campbell and M. Chandra
Functions of Stretch Activation in Heart Muscle
J. Gen. Physiol., January 30, 2006; 127(2): 89 - 94.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. Burkhoff, I. Mirsky, and H. Suga
Assessment of systolic and diastolic ventricular properties via pressure-volume analysis: a guide for clinical, translational, and basic researchers
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): H501 - H512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
K. B. Campbell, Y. Wu, A. M. Simpson, R. D. Kirkpatrick, S. G. Shroff, H. L. Granzier, and B. K. Slinker
Dynamic myocardial contractile parameters from left ventricular pressure-volume measurements
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2005; 289(1): H114 - H130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. Shimizu, K. Todaka, and D. Burkhoff
Load dependence of ventricular performance explained by model of calcium-myofilament interactions
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2002; 282(3): H1081 - H1091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. Shishido, K. Hayashi, K. Shigemi, T. Sato, M. Sugimachi, and K. Sunagawa
Single-Beat Estimation of End-Systolic Elastance Using Bilinearly Approximated Time-Varying Elastance Curve
Circulation, October 17, 2000; 102(16): 1983 - 1989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. Landesberg and S. Sideman
Force-velocity relationship and biochemical-to-mechanical energy conversion by the sarcomere
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2000; 278(4): H1274 - H1284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
H J Muntinga, A T M Gosselink, P K Blanksma, P J De Kam, E E V. D. Wall, and H J G M Crijns
Left ventricular beat to beat performance in atrial fibrillation: dependence on contractility, preload, and afterload
Heart, November 1, 1999; 82(5): 575 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. Karamanoglu and M. P. Feneley
Late systolic pressure augmentation: role of left ventricular outflow patterns
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 1999; 277(2): H481 - H487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. Landesberg and S. Sideman
Regulation of energy consumption in cardiac muscle: analysis of isometric contractions
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 1999; 276(3): H998 - H1011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
H. Miyano, Y. Nakayama, T. Shishido, M. Inagaki, T. Kawada, T. Sato, H. Miyashita, M. Sugimachi, J. Alexander Jr., and K. Sunagawa
Dynamic sympathetic regulation of left ventricular contractility studied in the isolated canine heart
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 1998; 275(2): H400 - H408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. S. Berger, K. Vlasica, C. M. Quick, K. A. Robinson, and S. G. Shroff
Ejection has both positive and negative effects on left ventricular isovolumic relaxation
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 1997; 273(6): H2696 - H2707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
T. Wannenburg, P. M. L. Janssen, D. Fan, and P. P. De Tombe
The Frank-Starling mechanism is not mediated by changes in rate of cross-bridge detachment
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 1997; 273(5): H2428 - H2435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. Senzaki, C.-H. Chen, and D. A. Kass
Single-Beat Estimation of End-Systolic Pressure-Volume Relation in Humans: A New Method With the Potential for Noninvasive Application
Circulation, November 15, 1996; 94(10): 2497 - 2506.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. W. Watkins, A. Higashiyama, Z. Chen, and M. M. LeWinter
Rapid Shortening During Relaxation Increases Activation and Improves Systolic Performance
Circulation, September 15, 1996; 94(6): 1475 - 1482.
[Abstract] [Full Text]