Circulation Research, Vol 64, 213-226, Copyright © 1989 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Vagally induced block and delayed conduction as a mechanism for circus movement tachycardia in frog atria

LV Rosenshtraukh, AV Zaitsev, VG Fast, AM Pertsov and VI Krinsky
Institute of Experimental Cardiology, Cardiology Research Center, Moscow, USSR.

Episodes of tachycardia induced by strong vagal stimulation in spontaneously beating isolated atria of frog (Rana temporaria) were studied with multielectrode mapping technique. These episodes were inducible in 19 of 39 preparations. The arrhythmia started several seconds after cessation of vagal stimulation strong enough to cause sinus arrest, without electrical stimulation of the myocardium. The arrhythmia consisted of two to 20 beats (6 +/- 4, mean +/- SD, n = 42) with a cycle length of 100-500 msec. Recording from 32 sites with spatial resolution of 1-2 mm showed that the arrhythmia was due to intra-atrial circus movement. The estimated perimeter of the reentrant circuit ranged from 6 to 20 mm. In circuits of the minimal size, the average conduction velocity along the circuit was as low as 2-3 cm/sec. Paroxysms of the tachycardia were always preceded by vagally induced nonuniform depression of conduction, with some areas of atria being completely blocked. As the vagal influence decreased, the blocked areas recovered in an inhomogeneous manner, their unblocking being significantly (p less than 0.05) delayed after inhibition of tissue cholinesterase by proserine. The reentrant tachycardia was initiated when a sinus impulse arrived during certain phase of the unblocking. Unlike the well-known mechanism of reentrant excitation, which is based on inhomogeneous refractoriness and critically timed extrabeat(s), the circus movement in our model depended on vagally induced conduction block and could be launched by a single sinus impulse.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. R. Efimov and V. V. Fedorov Chessboard of atrial fibrillation: reentry or focus? Single or multiple source(s)? Neurogenic or myogenic? Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2005; 289(3): H977 - H979. [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. F. Sharifov, V. V. Fedorov, G. G. Beloshapko, A. V. Glukhov, A. V. Yushmanova, and L. V. Rosenshtraukh Roles of adrenergic and cholinergic stimulation in spontaneous atrial fibrillation in dogs J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 4, 2004; 43(3): 483 - 490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Jalife, O. Berenfeld, and M. Mansour Mother rotors and fibrillatory conduction: a mechanism of atrial fibrillation Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2002; 54(2): 204 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Wakimoto, C. T Maguire, P. Kovoor, P. E Hammer, J. Gehrmann, J. K Triedman, and C. I Berul Induction of atrial tachycardia and fibrillation in the mouse heart Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2001; 50(3): 463 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Scheinman Mechanisms of atrial fibrillation: is a cure at hand? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2000; 35(6): 1687 - 1692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. P. Anyukhovsky and L. V. Rosenshtraukh Electrophysiological responses of canine atrial endocardium and epicardium to acetylcholine and 4-aminopyridine Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 1999; 43(2): 364 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Winfree Electrical turbulence in three-dimensional heart muscle Science, November 11, 1994; 266(5187): 1003 - 1006. [Abstract] [PDF]