Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 1981;49:442-452

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Noordergraaf, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Noordergraaf, A.

Circulation Research, Vol 49, 442-452, Copyright © 1981 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Pulse wave propagation

JK Li, J Melbin, RA Riffle and A Noordergraaf

This report evaluates pulse wave propagation with respect to contributions by vascular wall elastic and geometric properties, vessel wall and blood viscosity, and nonlinearities in system parameters and in the equations of motion. Discrepancies in results obtained with different experimental methods and theory are discussed and resolved. A three-point pressure technique was used to obtain measurements from the abdominal aorta, carotid, iliac, and femoral arteries of dogs. Computations involved linear, as well as nonlinear methods. Results are presented along a continuous path of transmission (abdominal aorta, iliac, femoral), and it is shown that variations in phase velocity can be explained entirely by the geometric variation of these vessels. Phase velocities are shown to be frequency independent at approximately greater than 4 Hz whereas attenuation increases progressively for higher frequencies. Determination of propagation coefficients using maximal, compounded values of reported viscoelastic and geometric properties just manages to span the range of phase velocities, determined in different laboratories, but does not do so for attenuation. Also, differences in experimental techniques cannot explain these discrepancies. Consideration of geometric taper, nonlinear compliance, all the terms in the equation of motion, and the effect of wall and blood viscosity resolves discrepancies between theoretical and experimentally derived phenomena.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
S. C. Millasseau, A. D. Stewart, S. J. Patel, S. R. Redwood, and P. J. Chowienczyk
Evaluation of Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity: Influence of Timing Algorithm and Heart Rate
Hypertension, February 1, 2005; 45(2): 222 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Schillinger, M. Exner, W. Mlekusch, M. Haumer, R. Ahmadi, H. Rumpold, O. Wagner, and E. Minar
Inflammatory Response to Stent Implantation: Differences in Femoropopliteal, Iliac, and Carotid Arteries
Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 529 - 535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
J. K.-J. Li
A New Description of Arterial Function: The Compliance-Pressure Loop
Angiology, July 1, 1998; 49(7): 543 - 548.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
S. M. Wells, B. L. Langille, and S. L. Adamson
In vivo and in vitro mechanical properties of the sheep thoracic aorta in the perinatal period and adulthood
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 1998; 274(5): H1749 - H1760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
J. K.-J. Li
Pulse Wave Reflections at the Aorto-Iliac Junction
Angiology, August 1, 1985; 36(8): 516 - 521.
[Abstract] [PDF]