Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 1968;23:753-769

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WENNEMARK, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by BRODY, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WENNEMARK, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by BRODY, D. A.
(Circulation Research. 1968;23:753.)
© 1968 American Heart Association, Inc.


Microelectrode Study of Delayed Conduction in the Canine Right Bundle Branch

JAMES R. WENNEMARK M.D.1, VICTOR J. RUESTA M.D.1, DANIEL A. BRODY M.D.1

1 Department of Medicine, Division of Circulatory Diseases, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Memphis, Tennessee 38103

The electrophysiology of conduction delay was investigated in the semi-isolated right bundle branch of 30 large mongrel dogs. Delay was produced by the external application of an electric blocking current to the bundle branch. Multiple recordings with glass capillary microelectrodes revealed two basic deflections associated with the delay phenomenon. An initial, or leading, deflection originated from the proximal or leading edge of the block and was rapidly transmitted through the block with progressive decay of voltage and rise velocity. A second, or trailing, deflection originated from the regenerative response at the distal or trailing edge of the block and was rapidly transmitted retrograde into the block, with progressive decay of voltage and rise velocity. The transmitted potentials appeared to be electrotonic in nature.

The leading deflection appeared to be the transmitted event which maintained a conduction ratio of 1:1 through the block. The magnitude of delay was then related to the time required for this deflection to reach the threshold potential and initiate a regenerative response in the trailing portion of the block where the cells were less affected by the blocking current.


Key Words: partial block • mechanism of block • electric blocking current • incomplete bundle-branch block • electrophysiology

Accepted on October 10, 1968




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
B.-R. Choi and G. Salama
Optical mapping of atrioventricular node reveals a conduction barrier between atrial and nodal cells
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 1998; 274(3): H829 - H845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]