Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 1968;22:695-702

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MEIJLER, F. L.
Right arrow Articles by DU PERRON, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MEIJLER, F. L.
Right arrow Articles by DU PERRON, J. C.
(Circulation Research. 1968;22:695.)
© 1968 American Heart Association, Inc.


Computer Analysis of the RR Interval-Contractility Relationship during Random Stimulation of the Isolated Heart

FRITS L. MEIJLER M.D.1, JAN STRACKEE Ph.D.1, FRANS J. L. VAN CAPELLE M.Sc.1, JEANNY C. DU PERRON M.D.1

1 University Department of Cardiology and Clinical Physiology, Wilhelmina Gasthuis, Amsterdam, and the Laboratory of Medical Physics of the University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Hemodynamic variability in patients with atrial fibrillation may originate from a direct influence of the variations in RR intervals on myocardial contractility. With the aid of a computer the serial autocorrelation function and the histogram of the RR intervals of patients with atrial fibrillation receiving no medication were produced. The RR intervals were randomly distributed and the histograms rather skew. Next, random rhythms with histograms matching those of the patients were produced with a radioactive source and a Geiger-Müller counter. These rhythms were used to stimulate isolated perfused rat hearts to study the relationship between the RR interval and a number of contractile parameters. The ECG and the isotonic contractions were digitized and processed by the computer. Serial crosscorrelation coefficients were computed between the RR interval on the one hand, and contraction height, contraction area, and maximum of the first derivative of the contraction on the other hand. The zero order crosscorrelation coefficient between the RR interval and contraction height was 0.6, between the RR interval and contraction area 0.8, and between the RR interval and maximum of first derivative 0.5. Although small, the first and second to approximately the tenth order coefficients were definitely negative. It is concluded that during a random rhythm the contractile parameters of an isolated heart are strongly related to the preceding RR interval. It is conceivable that this relation contributes to the variability of hemodynamic parameters during atrial fibrillation in man.


Key Words: atrial fibrillation • RR intervals • Frank-Starling mechanism • Poisson rhythm • depotentiation • serial crosscorrelation coefficients • potentiation • serial autocorrelation coefficients




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
H J Muntinga, A T M Gosselink, P K Blanksma, P J De Kam, E E V. D. Wall, and H J G M Crijns
Left ventricular beat to beat performance in atrial fibrillation: dependence on contractility, preload, and afterload
Heart, November 1, 1999; 82(5): 575 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. I. O. Brookes, P. A. White, M. Staples, P. J. Oldershaw, A. N. Redington, P. D. Collins, and M. I. M. Noble
Myocardial Contractility Is Not Constant During Spontaneous Atrial Fibrillation in Patients
Circulation, October 27, 1998; 98(17): 1762 - 1768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
S. M.C Hardman, M. I.M Noble, T. Biggs, and W.A. Seed
Evidence for an influence of mechanical restitution on beat-to-beat variations in haemodynamics during chronic atrial fibrillation in patients
Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 1998; 38(1): 82 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]