Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 1968;22:237-250

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ELLIOT, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by GREGG, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ELLIOT, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by GREGG, D. E.
(Circulation Research. 1968;22:237.)
© 1968 American Heart Association, Inc.


Day-to-Day Changes in Coronary Hemodynamics Secondary to Constriction of Circumflex Branch of Left Coronary Artery in Conscious Dogs

ERIC C. ELLIOT M.D., M.Sc.1, ELLIS L. JONES M.D.1, COLIN M. BLOOR M.D.1, ARTHUR S. LEON M.D.1, DONALD E. GREGG Ph.D., M.D.1

1 Department of Cardiorespiratory Diseases Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington D. C. 20012

The studies were carried out in four dogs. The effects of applying ameroid constrictors to the circumflex branch were observed on the circumflex blood flow, circumflex and peripheral circumflex pressures, circumflex reactive hyperemia and aortic-circumflex pressure difference. Recordings were successfully made for periods of 16 to 64 days. During this time the circumflex branch became completely occluded in three of the dogs. The circumflex blood flow remained in the normal range until reactive hyperemia (following a 10- to 12-second occlusion of the circumflex branch) almost disappeared; the flow then decreased to zero in 5 to 10 days. Although there was some rise in mean peripheral circumflex pressure and aortic-circumflex pressure difference before circumflex blood flow decreased, the major rise in these variables occurred only when flow and reactive hyperemia became markedly decreased. The maximum rate of rise of mean peripheral circumflex pressure varied from 6 to 15 mm Hg/24 hours. The experiments indicate that a severe degree of coronary insufficiency precedes a rise in mean peripheral circumflex pressure to 60 to 70 mm Hg. We interpret such increments in mean peripheral circumflex pressure to mean that large collaterals must be open; the studies with injection of Schlesinger mass confirmed this interpretation.


Key Words: circumflex blood flow • ameroid constrictors • peripheral circumflex pressure • electromagnetic flow transducer • aortic-circumflex pressure difference • coronary collateral circulation

Accepted on December 11, 1967




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
M. Fujita, D. P. McKown, M. D. McKown, and D. Franklin
Coronary Collateral Regression in Conscious Dogs
Angiology, August 1, 1990; 41(8): 621 - 630.
[Abstract] [PDF]