Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
« Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article »
Circulation Research. 1967;21:601-608

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SUGIMOTO, T.
Right arrow Articles by WALLACE, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SUGIMOTO, T.
Right arrow Articles by WALLACE, A. G.
(Circulation Research. 1967;21:601.)
© 1967 American Heart Association, Inc.

Factors Determining Vulnerability to Ventricular Fibrillation Induced by 60-CPS Alternating Current

TSUNEAKI SUGIMOTO M.D.1, STEPHEN F. SCHAAL M.D.2, ANDREW G. WALLACE M.D.2

1 Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27706; Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Japan
2 Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27706

Very weak, 60-cps alternating current applied directly to the heart can cause ventricular fibrillation; greater current strength is required to induce ventricular fibrillation with a single shock delivered during the vulnerable period of the cardiac cycle. The present experiments were designed to examine the basis of this difference. The studies were performed in anesthetized open-chest dogs. The current strength required to induce ventricular fibrillation was 0.52± 0.16 ma with 60 cps for 5 sec, and 15.0±4.3 ma with a single square-wave pulse of 10 msec. However, when the duration of 60 cps was reduced to produced only 4, 3, 2, or1 ventricular response, the threshold for ventricular fibrillation after the last response was 0.4, 2, 18, or 24 ma respectively. After any given number of successive premature ventricular responses, the fibrillation threshold was comparable with either 60 cps or a single pulse. We concluded that, if an accelerating ventricular tachycardia that is produced by 60-cps stimulation is of sufficient duration (5 or 6 beats), the VF threshold is reduced progressively after each premature ventricular response, thus making it possible to include VF with very weak current.


Key Words: electrophysiology of the heart • arrhythmias • electric shock • ventricular fibrillation threshold • pacemakers • re-entry • ventricular tachycardia • dog

Accepted on September 19, 1967




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 EuropaceHome page
T. Shirayama, H. Shiraishi, S. Yoshida, Y. Matoba, H. Imai, and M. Nakagawa
Atrial fibrillation threshold predicted long-term efficacy of pharmacological treatment of patients without structural heart disease
Europace, January 1, 2002; 4(4): 383 - 389.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 ScienceHome page
A. Winfree
Electrical turbulence in three-dimensional heart muscle
Science, November 11, 1994; 266(5187): 1003 - 1006.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Intern MedHome page
E. N. Moore and J. F. Spear
Ventricular Fibrillation Threshold: Its Physiological and Pharmacological Importance
Arch Intern Med, March 1, 1975; 135(3): 446 - 453.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search
Copyright © 1967 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited.