Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 1966;19:199-205

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by INTAGLIETTA, M.
Right arrow Articles by ZWEIFACH, B. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by INTAGLIETTA, M.
Right arrow Articles by ZWEIFACH, B. W.
(Circulation Research. 1966;19:199.)
© 1966 American Heart Association, Inc.


Indirect Method for Measurement of Pressure in Blood Capillaries

M. INTAGLIETTA Ph.D.,1 B. W. ZWEIFACH Ph.D.1

1 Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, and Department of Pathology, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York.

The capillary hydrostatic pressure of blood was measured indirectly. We used a microneedle to occlude exposed mesenteric capillaries in rats and frogs without trauma and then determined the motion of the trapped red blood cells that resulted from the absorption or filtration of water through the capillary wall.

The trajectory of red cells was determined from enlarged timed photomicrographs that cover both sides of the occlusion. Gain or loss of water was measured by following the trajectory of two or more red cells to avoid errors due to injury and incomplete occlusion and extrapolating the motion to the instant of occlusion.

Pressures were calculated from Starling's formula for fluid exchange. We assumed that the tissue parameters are an unknown constant in acute preparations; we used available values of filtration coefficients and colloidal osmotic pressures. The results show that 70 to 80% of the capillaries tested lost fluid, and therefore, their blood hydraulic pressure was higher than colloidal osmotic pressure. The pressures calculated in this way were similar to those measured by techniques requiring puncture of the capillary wall. Capillary arteriovenous pressure differences were approximately 4 mm Hg.


Key Words: capillary pressure • capillary exchange • osmotic and hydrostatic pressure • filtration coefficient • microcirculation • fluid movement across capillary • filtration-absorption balance • frog mesentery • rat omentum

Accepted on February 3, 1966